LOFT
LINES
A NEWSLETTER FROM HAARSTICK
SAILMAKERS
(800) 342-5033 (585) 342-5200
email: info@haarsticksailmakers.com
Web site: www.haarsticksailmakers.com
FALL
DISCOUNTS START NOW!!!
For the past 34 years, we have
made every effort to design and build sails with nothing short of the best
performance, quality, durability, service and value. This season has been one
of our best ever, as our racing customers have enjoyed an exceptional summer.
Also, the number of very nice comments from so many of our cruising customers,
indicates that we must be getting closer to these elusive goals! To show our
appreciation, we are not only offering our FALL DISCOUNT, BUT, for the first
time ever, a terrific Haarstick Hat, FREE!! for each sail ordered NOW
through
ü
Save 15% on any Single Sail Order!
ü
Save 20% on any Two or More Sails!
Best
SAVINGS of the year Now
through November 15th, 2004! Orders received after November
15 will be entitled to a 10%
Discount on single sail orders, and a 15% Discount on two or
more Sails Until
ü
Save
15%
on Roller Furling Conversions, Full Battens Conversions, Recuts, Luff Tape
Changes, UV Acrylic Leech and Foot
Save on all Sails Repairs that
arrive at our shop between October 1st and
===============================================================
We are continuously updating our customer database
and expanding our e-mail address list. Our E-Mail newsletter has received many
compliments, and we would like to ensure that you continue to receive it. If
your e-mail address has changed, please call us Toll Free at (800) 342-5033, or
(585) 342-5200, or e-mail us at info@haarsticksailmakers.com
We would also like to update all your information, including boat name, phone
numbers, and race results. If you know others that may want to receive this
please forward this newsletter to them.
==============================================================
There have been several important regattas since our last newsletter, and
I would like to list briefly some of our customers’ results.
Congratulations to Erik Will and crew for winning the 2004
Soverel 33 Nationals held at the
Duck Island Yacht Club on
Kudos to Eric Gesner, his wife Judy, and Dave Hanson for winning the Thistle
Nationals held at the Michigan City
Yacht Club 7/31- 8/8/2004 in a fleet of 80 boats! Also, Kudos to Erik Goethert
and his crew Bob and Lynda Bryant, for their 7th overall. What made
them unique in this talented fleet? They were flying the only two Haarstick
Triradial “Maxi-Runners” at the regatta! Eric e-mailed me after the regatta:
“The chute was fast.”
After qualifying for the championship fleet, Mark Sertl and crew placed 7th
overall in the Championship Division of the Lightning North Americans
(71 boats in the regatta), held at the Buffalo Canoe Club, August 9th-13th.
Mark was the ONLY boat in the fleet using a Haarstick Triradial
“Max-Runner”, and had a daily 1st and 7th in the 5
race, no throw out championship division of 39 boats.
Results: http://www.lightningclass.org/Results/results04/nashowcrew.htm
Brian Simkins with all Haarstick sails, had the most first place finishes
to place 2nd overall in the Ensign Nationals held at
http://www.ensignclass.com/2004EnsignNationalsResults.pdf
Kirk Reynolds won two Hospice
Regattas on
Tim Kinsella’s “Polestar” won the Beneteau 40.7 Division 1, with
Harry Voss’ “Silver Bullet” in second.
Dave Spang’s Custom 30 won Division 2, followed by Eric Will’s
“BushWacker” in 2nd.
Brook Richardson’s “Arrow” won Division 3, with Jim Hill’s
“Allegro” in 3rd, and, in Division 6, my own “Minute Hand”
won on a tie breaker with “Wind ‘N Spirits”..
Hospice Division Results http://www.ashly.com/gyc/races/hosp04.html
John Doyle won the Long Distance race at 2004 CORK REGATTA in
Brendan Benson wins 1st in Division at 2004
CORK with six straight 1st place finishes. Brenden also won his
division in the EYC long distance race, and was 1st overall at the
EYC regatta. Even though every boat in his PHRF division gave him time,
“Blaze” won every race boat for boat. “People could not believe how fast
we were”- Brendan.
For additional results, please check out our web site. We are updating
them on a daily basis. Please call or e-mail us with your results, so we can add
them, AND, you will receive a FREE Haarstick Belt!
===============================================================
What’s going on with our Triradial “Maxi-Runner” spinnakers? From
the wide variety of PHRF boats to many One Design classes, our spinnakers have a
well-deserved reputation of being the fastest running sails on the market! Our
PHRF, J-22 and J-24 spinnakers have been dominating the competition downwind for
years in the Upstate New York area. We have also won or placed in several major
One Design regattas such as the Thistle where the only two Haarstick spinnakers
in the regatta finished 1st and 7th, or the Lightning,
where the only Haarstick Spinnaker in the fleet, placed 7th! The
Upstate NY sailors know what others outside our area are learning- our
spinnakers are FAST!
We didn’t have to spend months developing these One Design spinnakers, with
endless boat for boat testing. We didn’t have to fiddle around making a bunch
of experimental prototypes. Our spinnaker designs for these classes are fast,
they were fast the first time up, and each successive spinnaker is just as fast.
They came off our exclusive, and completely unique spinnaker design program
that, like all our other sail design programs were developed from scratch, in
house. How many other sailmakers, no matter how big they are, can state this as
fact? I believe there are very few others, if any, except one.
We initially put our design programs on the Cornell University Mainframe in
1968, but it was only after our Gerber cutter was up and running in
With our cutter fully operational in 1973, we were cutting over 17,000
yards of cloth for Laser sails per month in
Over the years, we have been able to analyze the shapes that we have
developed, knowing that we are looking at the design as it is reproduced to an
accuracy of 0.008” in every panel. Each spinnaker panel is cut to its exact
and unique shape necessary to build the three-dimensional sail. There are no
shortcuts! We believe that we build the most accurately cut spinnakers in the
business: We have always glued the seams together before sewing. All panels must
line up perfectly; all assembled sections must fit together with NO hand fairing
or adjustments of the final assembled luff and foot. Sizes and girths must be,
and are right on the money! Design improvements can be evaluated, knowing the
cut and assembly of the sail is so accurate, that we are looking at the true
design shape of the spinnaker. The uncertainty and lack of duplication caused by
inaccurate hand cutting, or inaccurate equipment and assembly of other
spinnakers is not an issue with our Haarstick Triradial “Maxi-Runner”
spinnakers!
Our success in spinnaker design and construction is due to the technology
that we pioneered in this business, and our continuing refinements in design
that only this process allows. If you are looking for the absolutely fastest
spinnaker, for PHRF or One Design, our Triradial “Maxi-Runners” are the
sails to buy, and now is the best time!
===============================================================
“STRING”
SAILS:
Recently, many sailmakers have been in a rush to copy North’s 3DL.
Having introduced this production process in the
The idea behind these “string” sails is very simple: as the loads
concentrate into the corners of the sail, so do the reinforcing threads in the
laminate. By continuously increasing the thread count per inch into the corners,
instead of discrete changes as in paneled laminate sails, the distribution of
loads throughout the sail is matched by the changing thread count per inch in
the final laminate. Theoretically, this would allow the sail to be lighter for
the same overall strength.
How much lighter are “string” sails? Frankly, I don’t know, as I
haven’t weighed enough sails to compare. While it seems to be significant in
very large sails, for smaller sized boats 40 feet and down, I have not seen that
much weight savings, if any, versus our paneled sails. I think the extra amount
of glue that is required to laminate the material, especially in the corners of
the sail, offsets the weight savings of this process, at least to some extent.
Moreover for the size of boats we commonly see in our area, I have always
believed that the proper shape of the sail, combined with low stretch, and, most
importantly, the durability of the cloth with use are the most important factors
that make boats go fast, and stay fast. Small differences in the weight of the
sail will only produce small differences in potential speed, but a cloth that
rapidly looses its strength with use, or worse, delaminates is a primary cause
of the “slows”.
The “string” sailcloth manufacturing process is much different than
commercially made laminates. Whether the structural threads are laid down on the
film in a continuous manner from corner to corner, or on separate panels that
are later glued together, the sail itself is produced at the same time as the
cloth is manufactured. As the threads converge, and overlap in the high load
areas, the thickness of the assembled laminate increases, and the amount of glue
required to bond the final laminate together increases. After the top film is
applied, the laminate is squeezed together with a maximum of one atmospheric
pressure, which is, at most, 14.7 pounds per square inch. (Not 1400 pounds per
square inch, as claimed on their web site). The glue used to bond the laminate
is then heated, usually in sections as the heating element is moved across the
surface. After the curing process, the final lamination, which is now the sail,
is finished in the sail loft.
The most important drawback to this process is that the cloth is
manufactured at the same time as the sail. While you might think, “so what”,
remember this: No process is 100%
error free! Mistakes will occur. With this process, mistakes are really costly!
With commercial laminates, you can check the cloth BEFORE you cut it. Not so
with “string” sails! The final quality of ANY finished product in ANY
manufacturing environment is totally dependent on how soon in the process the
mistakes are found. If the cost of fixing any mistake equals the cost of
manufacture, the only fix is to start over from scratch. How extreme must the
mistake be before the cloth, now the sail, is thrown out? My guess is that it
would have to be very extreme!
I have been testing cloth for over 35 years, and have seen many, many
examples of delamination failure even in commercially manufactured cloth. These
fabrics are laminated as the structure is run through a set of high pressure
rollers. The pressure used to squeeze the glue into the substrate is MUCH higher
than any possible vacuum bagging pressure used in “string” sailcloth
construction. In addition, commercial laminates are a constant thickness, by
their very nature. Compared to the ever increasing overlapping of substrate
threads and resulting increasing thickness of the material as the thread layup
concentrates in the corners, combined with the relatively low laminating
pressure, it is not hard to understand the increased risk of delamination. When
we test cloth, and find it does not withstand our Impact Flutter test, we simply
don’t buy it. We ask for another sample to test. This procedure is relatively
inexpensive, so we can be extremely picky.
On the other hand, if you can’t determine if the lamination is good
until after the sail is built, it will cost a bundle to throw the entire sail
away and start over. That can really cut into your profit. How picky can you be,
and stay in business? If it is a high profile boat like the
===============================================================
The Wednesday night PHRF races at
===============================================================
**If you no longer wish to receive updates or Newsletters
please reply with “Remove”**